Open call for the Open Research Award 2021

Open call for the Open Research Award 2021

We invite you to submit your case study now! 

The University of Groningen Library (UB) and the Open Science Community Groningen launch the 2nd annual Open Research Award. The award celebrates the many ways in which academics make their research more accessible, transparent or reproducible.

600 words on your success or failure to use ‘open’ research practices.

Via this submission form

Now, up until September 1st!

We welcome the submission of no more than 600 words in length that discuss the use of one or more open practices in the conduct of research and/or communication of outputs to achieve specific research aims or solve particular problems.

The case studies ideally explore the challenges of making open choices as well as those that celebrate positive experiences and successful open science practices.  Staff members and students can submit case studies. All submissions will be screened for eligibility by a jury. All eligible cases receive an Open Research Award certificate. In addition, three eligible cases will be randomly drawn by the jury; each of which will receive 500 euros to be used for research material, travel costs etc. For more information check the webpage https://www.rug.nl/library/open-research-award/ or contact us via openresearchaward@rug.nl

OSCG workshop: Are you unintentionally p-hacking?

In research it is common to use p-values to decide whether an effect is found in a study or not. But can the p-value be trusted? It turns out that more often than researchers realize, it cannot!

Too often researchers unintentionally p-hack their results to their favored outcome. The fact p-hacking (most often) happens unintentional is scary, it means that it potentially can happen to all of us.

In this workshop by Maurits Masselink, you will learn what p-hacking is, how it happens, how to spot it, and importantly, what researchers can do to prevent it from happening as best as possible.

When? 24th of June, 13:00-14:30 CEST
Where? https://meet.google.com/yua-dumt-okt
For whom? Open to all


Bio: Maurits Masselink is a postdoctoral researcher working at the UMCG. His research interests are in psychology, psychiatry and research methodology. Maurits is a strong advocator of Open Science practices and is one of the founders of the Open Science Community Groningen (OSCG). The OSCG aims to facilitate large-scale adoption of open, reproducible and responsible science practices within the University of Groningen (UG) and the University Medical Center (UMCG). For more information and to join the OSCG visit the website www.openscience-groningen.nl

Online workshop 27 May 14:00-15:00: The Future is Open!

The future is open! 
How Open Science Communities can help transition towards Open Science as the future modus operandi

Join our online workshop 27 May 14:00-15:00 CEST: ‘The future is open! How Open Science Communities can help transition towards Open Science as the future modus operandi’ by Vera Heininga

In this talk, Vera Heininga will first discuss what she understands by Open Science (what is it, but also above all: what is it not?). Then she will discuss Open Science Communities (OSCs), what it entails exactly and how OSCs in the Netherlands can help / support researchers in the transition to Open Science. For the latter, she will draw on a recent article that was recently accepted by the journal “Science and Public Policy” (see the preprint here: https://osf.io/preprints/metaarxiv/7gct9/download).

Vera Heininga is the Open Science coordinator of the University of Groningen. She is a great fan of Open Science, meaning that she: loves research transparency; pre-registers her confirmatory analyzes a priori; uses Open Workflow Tools (e.g., R Markdown); publishes in Open Access journals; and makes her well-annotated programming code publicly available. Vera is also an interdisciplinary postdoc at the Faculty of Behavioral and Social Sciences of the University of Groningen, and co-founder of the Open Science Community Groningen (OSCG).

For whom: Students, researchers, policy makers, support staff

Click here to join the online workshop

Upcoming ReproducibiliTea meetings

DateTimeLocationTopicCheck it out
May 20, 202114:00 15:00meet.google.com/ecp-hbzy-euoEditorial policies and open science: Special guests: Rafaele Huntjens, Kai EpstudeKai’s editorial: https://econtent.hogrefe.com/doi/full/10.1027/1864-9335/a000303;
Rafaële’s editorial: https://www-sciencedirect-com.proxy-ub.rug.nl/science/article/pii/S0005791621000148;
Nudging Open Science paper: https://psyarxiv.com/zn7vt/
June 3, 202111:00 12:00meet.google.com/ecp-hbzy-euoDr. Serge Horbachh: Building a Myth or The importance of proper referencinghttps://osf.io/preprints/metaarxiv/aqyhg/
June 17, 202114:00 15:00meet.google.com/ecp-hbzy-euoThe role of academic libraries in nudging open science – special guest: Giulia TrentacostiNudging Open Science paper: https://psyarxiv.com/zn7vt/

ReproducibiliTea February 11th 11:00 – 12:00: Reflexivity as an Open Science Tool?

We will be tackling the question of how to use reflexivity in our research process, and how reflexivity could aid open science practices.  

Reflexivity is the process by which the researcher continually and explicitly engages in self-awareness and analysis of personal influences on the research process. Reflexivity on the part of the researcher allows them to question and adapt their interpretations, based on issues that arise during the study” (p.5 Field & Derksen, 2020). Practicing reflexivity throughout the research process, could help to produce an honest and critical account of the research process and potentially increase the quality of your interpretations and conclusions. 

Do you agree? And if yes, how to get started practicing reflexivity? How could it help in your personal journey towards more open science? Let’s discuss next week. 

For a bit of thought stimulating background, please read “Experimenter as automaton; experimenter as human: exploring the position of the researcher in scientific research (https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13194-020-00324-7) from Sarahanne M. Field and Maarten Derksen. 

Date/time: Thursday February 11, 2021 from 11:00 – 12:00
Location: http://meet.google.com/ecp-hbzy-euo

ReproducibiliTea: Does open science make you leave academia? (14.00 – 15.00, 28-1-2021!)

Does Open Science make you leave academia?, While open science practices can have many benefits, there are also downsides. Besides time investments and limited resources, learning about why open science is important can make you unsure of current research practices and (overly) sceptical of existing literature. Ultimately, promising researchers can become disheartened by the status quo, and decide to leave academia altogether. In our session we’ll discuss these issues and how to deal with them. We’ll add a personal touch, so come join us and share your thoughts!
As intro/background reading please have a look at Reflections on my PhD and building sustainable science | by Chris Hartgerink | Medium

ReproducibiliTea January 14, 11-12.00: What would you do to improve open science?

Dear all,

We hope that you all had a good start of the new year! Below are three announcements from your favorite Tea brewers:

To begin with, the next ReproducibiliTea meeting is on January 14, 2021 (yes, that’s in 3 days already!). We ‘d like to have a discussion about how to improve Open Science. If you had money (say, 50.000 euros), what would you do with it to enhance (Open) Science in general? The topic is inspired by the recent launch of a new NWO funding instrument (https://www.nwo.nl/en/news/new-funding-instrument-stimulate-open-science). We’ll have a brainstorm on big ideas (what would you do with 50.000 euros?) and while we’re at it, address smaller goals as well. What are your Open Science goals for 2021? Keep on reading!